炭素回収・利用・貯留（CCUS）市場2026-2036：技術、市場予測、参入企業

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Markets 2026-2036: Technologies, Market Forecasts, and Players

CCUS市場の見通し、10年間の詳細予測、企業プロファイル、主要セクターのポイントソース炭素回収、直接空気回収（DAC）、CO2輸送・貯留（T＆S）、CO2利用技術評価炭素回収・利用・貯留（CCU... もっと見る

出版社	出版年月	電子版価格	納期	ページ数	言語
IDTechEx アイディーテックエックス	2025年9月3日	US$7,000 電子ファイル（1-5ユーザライセンス）ライセンス・価格情報注文方法はこちら	お問合わせください	505	英語

サマリー

CCUS市場の見通し、10年間の詳細予測、企業プロファイル、主要セクターのポイントソース炭素回収、直接空気回収（DAC）、CO2輸送・貯留（T＆S）、CO2利用技術評価

炭素回収・利用・貯留（CCUS）技術は、排ガスから、あるいは大気から直接CO2を回収する。この回収された二酸化炭素は、恒久的に貯蔵されるか、収益を生み出すために利用される。各国政府は、CCUSが産業の脱炭素化と廃棄物CO2の価値化に果たす役割を認識し、カーボンプライシング、税額控除、補助金などを通じて、CCUSに有利な政策環境を作り続けている。石油・ガス会社がCO2輸送・貯蔵サービスの提供に軸足を移し、データセンターのハイパースケーラーが直接大気回収（DAC）や生物起源CCUS（BECCS）から得られる炭素クレジットの市場を創出するなど、民間セクターの重要な役割が明らかになりつつある。

「炭素回収・利用・貯留（CCUS）市場2026-2036：技術、市場予測、プレーヤー」は、新興CCUS産業と炭素市場の包括的な展望を提供し、今後10年間のCCUS産業を形成する技術的、経済的、規制的、環境的側面を詳細に分析する。炭素回収、炭素利用、炭素貯蔵技術を評価し、各分野における最新の進歩、主要プレーヤー、機会と障壁について論じている。また、CCUSの炭素回収能力に関する2036年までの10年間のきめ細かな予測（CO2エンドポイント、ポイントソース対DAC、産業部門、地域別にセグメント化）を、独占分析、60のインタビューに基づく企業プロフィール、350社以上の企業取材とともに掲載している。

CCUS市場の加速は2025年に入っても続いており、ノーザンライツT＆SやストラトスDACなど、注目すべき世界初のプロジェクトが始動している。CCUSプロジェクトのパイプラインは膨らみ続けており、2025年時点で5,000万トンの新規生産能力が建設中である。このIDTechExレポートは、CCUSのビジネスモデル、経済性、主要／新興の捕捉技術の概要を提供している。

ビジネスモデル

新規の大規模CCUS 設備を稼動させるには、通常、税額控除や政府補助金が必要である。主な例としては、米国の45Q税額控除（最近、トランプ政権の「ビッグ・ビューティフル・ビル」で二酸化炭素の利用が促進された）や、英国政府が産業用CCUSクラスターに200億ポンドの資金拠出を発表したことなどが挙げられる。コンプライアンス炭素市場メカニズムが、最終的にCCUSを長期的に可能にすると期待されている。2025年時点では、世界のCO2排出量の28％が何らかの炭素価格設定によってカバーされており、2026年には欧州連合（EU）のCBAM（炭素国境調整メカニズム）が登場し、新たな炭素市場開発の動機付けとなる。

さらに、新しい部分的チェーンCCUSハブ、クラスター、ネットワークは、規模の経済を解き放ち、CCUS開発をデボトルネックにする。CO2輸送とCO2貯蔵インフラを共有することで、この新しいCCUSビジネスモデルはCCUSプロジェクト開発を合理化する。

点源捕捉技術の開発

点源炭素捕捉のためのアミン系溶剤は技術的に成熟しているが、脱混合溶剤や水溶性溶剤のような革新的な溶剤の商業化が続いている。このIDTechExのレポートには、吸収塔/ストリッパーカラムにおける物質移動を改善するための進歩を含む、アミン溶剤による炭素回収のプラントバランスに関する考察も含まれている。

アミン系溶媒以外にも、炭素回収の分野では新興企業が溶融ホウ酸塩、促進輸送膜、溶融炭酸塩燃料電池、極低温アプローチなど幅広い技術を追求している。これらの技術は最終的に、回収に必要なエネルギー需要の削減を目指している。本レポートでは、IDTechExが主要な炭素回収プレーヤーを特定し、回収技術をベンチマークしている。

地域別CCUS市場予測

米国は、45Q税額控除支援とCO2-EOR（石油増進回収法）の強力な歴史により、CCUSの世界的リーダーである。欧州、中国、カナダ、英国を含む他の地域も、CCUSの世界的なスケールアップに貢献するだろう。例えば、EUの最近のネット・ゼロ産業法は、2030年までに少なくとも5,000万トンの年間CO2永久貯蔵容量を義務付けている。このIDTechExレポートには、CCUS市場の地域別予測が含まれており、地域によるCCUS成長の違いを示している。

本レポートで扱う主な質問

CCUSとは何か、気候変動に対処するためにどのように利用できるか
既存のCCUSプロジェクトの実績と経済性はどのようなものか
CCUSの市場見通しは
市場成長の主な推進要因と障壁は何か
炭素価格制度やその他のインセンティブは、CCUSの規模拡大にどのように役立つか
炭素回収技術のコストは
点源炭素回収と直接空気回収では、どのような新しい技術革新が起きているのか
二酸化炭素は産業的に何に利用できるのか
CCUSの主要プレーヤーは

主要な側面

本レポートは以下の情報を提供する

技術と市場分析

燃焼後回収、燃焼前回収、酸素燃焼回収、直接空気回収、CO2利用、CO2輸送、CO2貯留の分野における最新技術と技術革新の状況
セメントおよびその他の重工業、水素、電力、石油・ガス、化学など、さまざまなセクターのCCUSソリューションを詳細に網羅
CCUS市場に影響を与える主な規制や炭素価格政策を含むCCUSの市場ポテンシャル
CCUS技術を拡大するための主要戦略、ビジネスモデル、経済性
技術適合性レベル（TRL）、コスト、規模の可能性などの要因に基づくベンチマーク

プレーヤー分析と動向

主要CCUS関連企業の一次情報。
CCUS関連
企業の最新
動向の分析。最新の開発状況、発表された観測プロジェクト、資金調達、動向、パートナーシップ

市場予測と分析

CCUSを点源回収とDAC、CO2運命（貯蔵、新たな利用、EOR）、セクター（化石燃料発電、BECCUS、予備燃焼（青色水素/アンモニア/化学）、天然ガス処理、セメント、鉄鋼）、地域（米国、カナダ、欧州、英国、アイルランド、中国、アジア太平洋地域、中東、その他の地域）に細分化し、2036年までの10年間のCCUS市場をきめ細かく予測

ページTOPに戻る

Summary

CCUS market outlook, ten-year granular forecasts, company profiles, and technology assessment of point-source carbon capture for key sectors, direct air capture (DAC), CO2 transport and storage (T&S), and CO2 utilization

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies capture CO2 from flue gases or directly from the atmosphere. This captured carbon dioxide is then permanently stored or utilized to generate revenue. Governments have recognized the role CCUS can play in decarbonizing industry and valorizing waste CO2, and are continuing to create favourable CCUS policy environments through carbon pricing, tax credits, and subsidies. The essential role of the private sector is crystallizing, with examples including oil and gas companies pivoting into providing CO2 transportation and storage services and data center hyperscalers creating markets for carbon credits from direct air capture (DAC) and biogenic CCUS (BECCS).

"Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Markets 2026-2036: Technologies, Market Forecasts, and Players" provides a comprehensive outlook of the emerging CCUS industry and carbon markets, with an in-depth analysis of the technological, economic, regulatory, and environmental aspects that are set to shape the CCUS industry over the next 10 years. Carbon capture, carbon utilization, and carbon storage technologies are evaluated, discussing latest advancements, key players, and opportunities and barriers within each area. The report also includes a 10-year granular forecast until 2036 for CCUS carbon capture capacity (segmented by CO2 end-point, point-source vs DAC, industrial sector, and region) alongside exclusive analysis, 60 interview-based company profiles, and coverage of 350+ companies.

The acceleration of CCUS markets has continued into 2025, with noteworthy first-of-a-kind projects coming online including Northern Lights T&S and Stratos DAC. As the CCUS project pipeline continues to swell, with 50 million tonnes of new capacity under construction as of 2025, this IDTechEx report provides an overview of CCUS business models, economics, and leading/emerging capture technologies.

Business model

Tax credits and/or government subsidies are still typically needed to bring new large-scale CCUS capacity online. Key examples include the US 45Q tax credit (recently boosted for carbon dioxide utilization in the Trump administration's Big Beautiful Bill) and the UK government announcing £20 billion in funding for industrial CCUS clusters. Compliance carbon market mechanisms are expected to ultimately enable CCUS long-term. As of 2025, 28% of global CO2 emissions are covered by some form of carbon pricing, with the arrival of the European Union CBAM (carbon border adjustment mechanism) in 2026 motivating new carbon market developments.

Additionally, new partial chain CCUS hubs, clusters, and networks are set to unlock economies of scale and debottleneck CCUS development. By providing shared CO2 transportation and CO2 storage infrastructure, this new CCUS business model will streamline CCUS project development.

Point-source capture technology developments

Amine solvents for point-source carbon capture are technologically mature, but innovations continue to be commercialized such as demixing solvents and water-lean solvents. This IDTechEx report also includes balance of plant considerations for amine solvent carbon capture, including advances to improve mass transfer in absorber/stripper columns.

Beyond amine solvents, emerging start-ups in the carbon capture space are pursuing a broad range of technologies including molten borate salts, facilitated transport membranes, molten carbonate fuel cells, and cryogenic approaches. These technologies ultimately aim to reduce the energy demand of capture. In this report, IDTechEx identifies key carbon capture players and benchmarks capture technologies.

Regional CCUS market forecasts

The US is the world leader for CCUS, due its 45Q tax credit support and strong history of CO2-EOR (enhanced oil recovery). Other regions including Europe, China, Canada, and the UK will also be instrumental for the global scale-up of CCUS. For example, the EU's recent Net-Zero Industry Act mandates an annual CO2 permanent storage capacity of at least 50 million tonnes by 2030. This IDTechEx report includes regional forecasting of CCUS markets, illustrating differences in CCUS growth by geography.

Key questions answered in this report

What is CCUS and how can it be used to address climate change?
What does the performance and economics of existing CCUS projects look like?
What is the market outlook for CCUS?
What are the key drivers and barriers of market growth?
How can carbon pricing schemes and other incentives help scale up CCUS?
How much does carbon capture technology cost?
What new technology innovations are occurring in point-source carbon capture and direct air capture?
What can carbon dioxide be used for industrially?
Who are the key players in CCUS?

Key Aspects

This report provides the following information

Technology and market analysis

State of the art and technology innovation in the field for post-combustion capture, pre-combustion capture, oxyfuel combustion capture, direct air capture, CO2 utilization, CO2 transportation, and CO2 storage.
Detailed coverage of CCUS solutions for different sectors: cement and other heavy industry, hydrogen, power, oil and gas, chemicals.
Market potential of CCUS, including key regulations and carbon pricing policies influencing the CCUS market.
Key strategies, business models, and economics for scaling CCUS technologies.
Benchmarking based on factors such as technology readiness level (TRL), cost, and scale potential.

Player analysis and trends

Primary information from key CCUS-related companies. 60 interview-based company profiles
Analysis of CCUS players' latest developments, observing projects announced, funding, trends, and partnerships

Market forecasts and analysis

10-year granular CCUS market forecasts until 2036 for CCUS subdivided by point-source capture vs DAC, CO2 fate (storage, emerging utilization, or EOR), sector (fossil fuel power, BECCUS, pre-combustion (blue hydrogen/ammonia/chemicals), natural gas processing, cement, and steel), and region (US, Canada, Europe, UK and Ireland, China, Rest of Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Rest of World).

ページTOPに戻る

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1. What is Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)?

1.2. Why CCUS and why now?

1.3. CCUS business model overview: Value from CO2

1.4. Development of the CCS business model

1.5. CCUS business model: Networks and hub model

1.6. CCUS business model: Partial-chain

1.7. World map of operational and under construction large-scale dedicated CO2 storage sites

1.8. Carbon dioxide storage-type maturity and operator landscape

1.9. CO2-Enhanced oil recovery market

1.10. Carbon pricing and carbon markets

1.11. Compliance carbon pricing mechanisms across the globe

1.12. Alternative to carbon pricing in the US: 45Q tax credits

1.13. CCUS forecast by CO₂ end point - Storage and enhanced oil recovery

1.14. Why CO2 utilization?

1.15. Current scale for CO2U products

1.16. Main CO2 capture systems

1.17. Which carbon capture technologies are most mature?

1.18. When should different carbon capture technologies be used?

1.19. Point-source carbon capture technology providers

1.20. High-concentration CO2 sources are the low-hanging fruits

1.21. Point-source CCUS capture capacity forecast by CO2 source sector, Mtpa of CO2

1.22. Leading DAC companies

1.23. What are the major challenges for scaling up direct air capture?

1.24. The momentum behind CCUS is building up

1.25. CCUS capture capacity by region - North America

1.26. CO2 transportation overview

1.27. Access More With an IDTechEx Subscription

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1. What is Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS)?

2.2. The CCUS value chain

2.3. Why CCUS and why now?

2.4. Carbon capture

2.5. Pathways to lower capture costs

2.6. CO2 storage

2.7. Development of the CCS business model

2.8. Why CO2 utilization?

2.9. CO2 transportation

2.10. How much does CCUS cost?

2.11. When can CCUS be considered net-zero?

2.12. CCUS Market Challenges

2.13. Enabling large-scale CCUS

3. BUSINESS MODELS FOR CCUS

3.1. Introduction

3.1.1. CCUS business model overview: Value from CO2

3.1.2. Development of the CCS business model

3.1.3. Government funding support mechanisms for CCS

3.1.4. Government ownership of CCS projects varies across countries

3.1.5. CCUS business model: Full chain

3.1.6. CCUS business model: Networks and hub model

3.1.7. CCUS business model: Partial-chain

3.1.8. Carbon dioxide utilization business model

3.2. Carbon Pricing and Carbon Markets

3.2.1. Carbon pricing and carbon markets

3.2.2. Compliance carbon pricing mechanisms across the globe

3.2.3. What is the price of CO2 in global carbon pricing mechanisms?

3.2.4. The European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS)

3.2.5. Has the EU ETS had an impact?

3.2.6. What changes are needed for the EU ETS to support CCUS?

3.2.7. EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

3.2.8. EU CBAM will be the first of many internationally

3.2.9. Alternative to carbon pricing in the US: 45Q tax credits

3.2.10. The role of voluntary carbon markets in supporting CCUS

3.2.11. How high does carbon pricing need to be to support CCS?

4. STATUS OF THE CCUS INDUSTRY

4.1. The momentum behind CCUS is building up

4.2. CCUS milestones in 2024/2025

4.3. Global pipeline of carbon capture facilities built and announced

4.4. Analysis of CCUS development

4.5. CO2 source: From which sectors has CO2 been captured historically?

4.6. Which sectors will see the biggest growth in CCUS?

4.7. CO2 fate: Where does/will the captured CO2 go?

4.8. Regional analysis of CCUS Projects

4.9. Major CCUS players

4.10. CCUS project performance - natural gas processing

4.11. CCUS project performance - natural gas processing commentary

4.12. CCUS project performance - power generation

4.13. CCUS project performance - key takeaways

4.14. Boundary Dam - battling capture technical issues

4.15. Petra Nova's long shutdown: Lessons for the industry?

4.16. How much does CCUS cost?

4.17. Costs and financing of large-scale CCUS projects

5. CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES

5.1. Introduction

5.1.1. The CCUS value chain

5.1.2. Main CO2 capture systems

5.1.3. Status of point source carbon capture

5.1.4. Natural gas sweetening

5.1.5. Post-combustion CO2 capture

5.1.6. Pre-combustion CO2 capture

5.1.7. Oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture

5.1.8. Main CO2 capture technologies

5.1.9. Comparison of CO2 capture technologies

5.1.10. Maturity of carbon capture technologies - overview

5.1.11. Which carbon capture technologies are most mature?

5.1.12. When should different carbon capture technologies be used?

5.1.13. Typical conditions and performance for different capture technologies

5.1.14. CO2 concentration and partial pressure varies with emission source

5.1.15. How does CO₂ partial pressure influence cost?

5.1.16. High-concentration CO2 sources are the low-hanging fruits

5.1.17. No single carbon capture technology will be the best across all applications

5.1.18. Carbon capture technology providers for existing large-scale projects

5.1.19. Capture percentage exceeding 90% are the current industry standard

5.1.20. What is meant by CO2 capture rate?

5.1.21. Making the case for CO2 capture percentages below 90%

5.1.22. Contributions to carbon capture cost

5.1.23. Metrics for CO2 capture agents

5.1.24. State-of-the-art: Capture percentages

5.1.25. State-of-the-art: Energy consumption

5.1.26. Technology readiness of carbon capture technologies (1/2)

5.1.27. Technology readiness of carbon capture technologies (2/2)

5.1.28. Point-source carbon capture technology providers by technology

5.2. Solvents for Carbon Capture

5.2.1. Solvent-based CO₂ capture

5.2.2. Chemical absorption solvents

5.2.3. Amine-based post-combustion CO₂ absorption

5.2.4. The development of amine solvents for carbon capture

5.2.5. Innovations in amine solvents

5.2.6. Amine-solvents dominate CCUS but challenges remain

5.2.7. Amine solvent carbon capture technology providers for post-combustion capture (1/2)

5.2.8. Amine solvent carbon capture technology providers for post-combustion capture (2/2)

5.2.9. Hot Potassium Carbonate (HPC) process

5.2.10. HPC carbon capture technology providers for carbon capture

5.2.11. Chemical absorption solvents used in current operational CCUS point-source projects (1/2)

5.2.12. Chemical absorption solvents used in current operational CCUS point-source projects (2/2)

5.2.13. Cost breakdown of chemical solvent post-combustion capture

5.2.14. Physical absorption solvents

5.2.15. Comparison of key physical absorption solvents

5.2.16. Physical solvents used in current operational CCUS point-source projects

5.2.17. When should solvent-based carbon capture not be used?

5.3. Balance of Plant for Amine Solvent Carbon Capture

5.3.1. Introduction to amine solvent post-combustion carbon capture

5.3.2. Summary of carbon capture balance of plant (BoP) components

5.3.3. Flue gas preconditioning/pretreatment for post-combustion capture

5.3.4. Babcock & Wilcox flue gas pretreatment portfolio

5.3.5. Absorber columns for amine solvent based carbon capture

5.3.6. Absorber column structured packing for amine solvent based carbon capture

5.3.7. Material innovation in structured packing for absorber columns

5.3.8. Water use in carbon capture plants

5.3.9. Absorber/stripper innovation: Rotating packed beds

5.3.10. Hybrid process - membrane contactors

5.3.11. Main heat exchanger: Lean/rich amine cross exchanger

5.3.12. Auxiliary heat exchangers

5.3.13. Technology providers of heat exchangers for carbon capture

5.3.14. Innovations in reducing reboiler duty

5.3.15. Large-scale CO2 compression technologies

5.3.16. CO2 compression costs

5.3.17. BoP case study: ION Clean Energy

5.3.18. Supply chain considerations of BoP technologies by region

5.3.19. Equipment and Technology Providers for CCUS in China

5.3.20. High value matrix for key components in post-combustion solvent-based carbon capture

5.4. Emerging Solvents for Carbon Capture

5.4.1. Company landscape: Emerging solvents for carbon capture

5.4.2. Chilled ammonia process (CAP)

5.4.3. Molten borates

5.4.4. Applicability of chemical absorption solvents capture solvents for post-combustion applications

5.5. Sorbents for Carbon Capture

5.5.1. Solid sorbent-based CO₂ separation

5.5.2. Adsorbents in pressure swing adsorption: Hydrogen separation

5.5.3. Adsorbents in pressure swing adsorption: Carbon capture

5.5.4. Overview of solid sorbents explored for carbon capture

5.5.5. Zeolite-based adsorbents

5.5.6. Carbon-based adsorbents

5.5.7. Metal organic framework (MOF) adsorbents

5.5.8. Solid amine-based adsorbents

5.5.9. Solid sorbent processes used in operational CCUS point-source projects

5.5.10. Solid sorbent materials for carbon capture overview

5.5.11. Sorption enhanced water gas shift (SEWGS)

5.6. Membrane-based Carbon Capture

5.6.1. Introduction to gas separation membranes for decarbonization

5.6.2. Developing new membrane materials: Key trends

5.6.3. Comparing gas separation membrane materials

5.6.4. Composite membranes for gas separation: Overview

5.6.5. Membranes for post-combustion CO2 capture

5.6.6. When should alternatives to solvent-based carbon capture be used?

5.6.7. Leading players in membrane-based post-combustion capture

5.6.8. Economics of polymer membranes for post-combustion capture

5.6.9. Increasing CO2 recovery rates for polymer membranes: MTR example

5.6.10. Facilitated transport membranes (FTM) for post-combustion carbon capture

5.6.11. Facilitated transport membrane materials for post-combustion carbon capture

5.6.12. Challenges and innovations for membranes in post-combustion capture

5.6.13. 2024/2025 Industry News: Membranes for post-combustion capture

5.6.14. Graphene membranes for post-combustion carbon capture: emerging material

5.6.15. MOF membranes for post-combustion carbon capture: Emerging material

5.6.16. Membranes for direct air capture

5.6.17. Gas separation membranes in blue hydrogen production (pre-combustion capture)

5.7. Cryogenic CO2 Capture

5.7.1. Cryogenic CO₂ capture: An emerging alternative

5.7.2. When should cryogenic carbon capture be used?

5.7.3. Status of cryogenic CO2 capture technologies

5.7.4. Cryogenic direct air capture companies

5.7.5. Cryogenic CO₂ capture in blue hydrogen: Cryocap™

5.8. Oxyfuel Combustion Capture

5.8.1. Oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture

5.8.2. Oxygen separation technologies for oxy-fuel combustion

5.8.3. Oxyfuel combustion in the cement sector

5.8.4. Oxyfuel combustion for power generation

5.8.5. Novel oxyfuel: Chemical looping combustion

5.8.6. Oxyfuel combustion for blue hydrogen

5.8.7. 5.9 Novel Carbon Capture Technologies

5.8.8. Calcium looping

5.8.9. Leilac process: Direct CO2 capture in cement plants

5.8.10. CO2 capture with Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFCs)

5.8.11. Algae CO2 capture

6. CARBON CAPTURE FOR KEY INDUSTRIES

6.1. Introduction

6.1.1. CO2 source: From which sectors has CO2 been captured historically?

6.1.2. Which sectors will see the biggest growth in CCUS?

6.1.3. Capture costs vary by sector

6.2. Cement

6.2.1. CCUS will be the most important cement decarbonization technology by 2050

6.2.2. Which cement decarbonization technology will have the biggest impact?

6.2.3. Status of carbon capture in the cement industry

6.2.4. First large-scale cement sector CCUS project

6.2.5. Major CCUS projects in the cement sector

6.2.6. Post-combustion solvent capture is less disruptive to clinker manufacturing

6.2.7. Benchmarking carbon capture technologies in the cement sector

6.2.8. Carbon capture in the cement sector: Key takeaways

6.3. Steel

6.3.1. CCUS will play a limited role in decarbonizing the iron and steel sector

6.3.2. Overview of CCUS for iron & steel (1)

6.3.3. Overview of CCUS for iron & steel (2)

6.3.4. CCUS for BF-BOF (blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace) process

6.3.5. Post combustion capture technologies for BF-BOF process

6.3.6. Pre-combustion carbon capture for ironmaking (1)

6.3.7. Pre-combustion carbon capture for ironmaking (2)

6.3.8. Sorption enhanced water gas shift (SEWGS)

6.3.9. Gas recycling and oxyfuel combustion for ironmaking

6.3.10. Blast furnace gas CO2 capture technologies comparison

6.3.11. Carbon capture for natural gas-based DRI

6.3.12. CCUS project pipeline for the steel sector

6.3.13. CO2 utilization for the steel sector

6.3.14. Challenges and opportunities for CCUS in the steel sector

6.4. Power Generation

6.4.1. Power plants with CCUS generate less energy

6.4.2. CO2 capture from coal power generation

6.4.3. CO2 capture from gas power generation

6.4.4. Carbon capture and gas power

6.4.5. Gas power CCS for data centers

6.4.6. Key cost reduction opportunities in power CCS

6.5. Blue Hydrogen, Blue Ammonia, and Chemicals

6.5.1. Major drivers for hydrogen production & adoption

6.5.2. Hydrogen value chain overview

6.5.3. State of the hydrogen market today

6.5.4. Challenges in green hydrogen production

6.5.5. Cost comparison of different types of hydrogen

6.5.6. The case for blue hydrogen production

6.5.7. Overview of blue, turquoise & biomass-based H2 production methods

6.5.8. Blue hydrogen: Main syngas production technologies

6.5.9. Key technology players in blue hydrogen

6.5.10. Pre- vs post-combustion CO2 capture for blue hydrogen

6.5.11. Overview of CCUS blue hydrogen projects

6.5.12. Blue hydrogen production - SMR with CCUS

6.5.13. Capturing CO2 from ATR & POX is easier

6.5.14. CO2 capture retrofit options for blue H2 production

6.5.15. CO2 capture retrofit options - Honeywell UOP example

6.5.16. Cost comparison: Commercial CO2 capture systems for blue H2

6.5.17. Real world data: CO2 capture systems for blue hydrogen

6.5.18. Technologies for future blue hydrogen projects

6.5.19. Key innovation areas in blue hydrogen

6.5.20. Impact on the US hydrogen industry - many project cancellations

6.5.21. Outcome - a smaller green hydrogen market in the medium term

6.5.22. Overview of EU hydrogen policy mechanisms

6.5.23. Carbon capture for chemicals

6.6. Maritime

6.6.1. Remaining challenges for onboard carbon capture

6.6.2. Recent developments in onboard carbon capture for the maritime sector

6.6.3. Onboard carbon capture: Amine solvents

6.6.4. Onboard carbon capture: CaO looping

6.6.5. Onboard carbon capture: Other technologies

6.6.6. Economics of onboard carbon capture and storage

7. CARBON CAPTURE FOR CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL (CDR)

7.1. CDR Introduction

7.1.1. What is the difference between CDR and CCUS?

7.1.2. The importance of carbon dioxide removals

7.1.3. The CDR business model and its challenges: Carbon credits

7.1.4. High-quality carbon removals: Durability, permanence, additionality

7.1.5. Scale and technology readiness level of carbon dioxide removal methods

7.1.6. Shifting buyer preferences for durable CDR in carbon credit markets

7.1.7. Overall picture: voluntary carbon credit markets in 2024

7.1.8. Why voluntary and compliance carbon markets need to merge for CDR

7.2. Direct Air Capture (DAC) Introduction

7.2.1. What is direct air capture (DAC)?

7.2.2. Current status of DACCS

7.2.3. DACCS project pipeline: Locations and technologies

7.2.4. Momentum: Policy support for DAC by region

7.2.5. The role of tax credits in supporting DACCS: 45Q and ITC

7.2.6. The US has plans to establish 20 large-scale regional DAC Hubs

7.2.7. Momentum: Private investment in DAC

7.2.8. Where did money for DAC come from in 2024?

7.2.9. Power requirements for DAC

7.2.10. Nameplate capacity vs actual net removal

7.2.11. Difficulties sourcing clean energy

7.2.12. Operational flexibility - powering DAC with intermittent renewables

7.2.13. What are the major challenges for scaling up direct air capture?

7.3. Leading DAC Technologies

7.3.1. CO2 capture/separation mechanisms in DAC

7.3.2. Direct air capture technologies

7.3.3. Regeneration methods for solid and liquid DAC

7.3.4. Comparing regeneration methods for solid and liquid DAC

7.3.5. Leading DAC companies

7.3.6. Direct air capture space: Technology and location breakdown

7.3.7. Solid sorbents for DAC

7.3.8. Climeworks

7.3.9. Process flow diagram of S-DAC: Climeworks

7.3.10. Solid sorbents - semi-continuous operation can lower energy intensity

7.3.11. Heirloom

7.3.12. Process flow diagram of CaO looping: Heirloom

7.3.13. Liquid solvents for DAC

7.3.14. Liquid solvent-based DAC: Carbon Engineering

7.3.15. Carbon Engineering

7.3.16. Stratos: Bringing DAC to the half megatonne scale

7.3.17. Process flow diagram of L-DAC: Carbon Engineering

7.3.18. Which DAC technologies will be the most successful?

7.3.19. How will DAC technologies develop?

7.4. Electroswing/Electrochemical DAC Technologies

7.4.1. Electroswing/electrochemical DAC

7.4.2. Types of electrochemical DAC (1/2)

7.4.3. Types of electrochemical DAC (2/2)

7.4.4. Desired characteristics of electrochemical cell components

7.4.5. Electrochemical DAC company landscape

7.4.6. Benchmarking electrochemical DAC methods

7.4.7. Technical challenges in electrochemical DAC

7.4.8. Electrochemical DAC: Flexibility for low-cost intermittent renewable power

7.4.9. Electrochemical DAC costs depend strongly on electricity prices

7.4.10. Electrochemical DAC: Key takeaways

7.4.11. 7.5 Novel DAC Technologies

7.4.12. Moisture-swing direct air capture (humidity swing)

7.4.13. Ion exchange resins for moisture swing DAC

7.4.14. Reactive direct air capture - combined capture and conversion

7.5. DAC Economics

7.5.1. Business models for DAC

7.5.2. Examples of storage providers for DAC

7.5.3. Direct air capture carbon credit selling prices

7.5.4. Component specific capture cost contributions for DACCS

7.5.5. Reaching a capture cost of $100/tonne of CO2

7.6. BECCS (Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage)

7.6.1. Introduction to BECCS

7.6.2. Most existing BECCS projects are in ethanol production

7.6.3. Amine solvents dominate BECCS for biomass power

7.6.4. Government support for BECCS is accelerating

7.6.5. BECCS business model - Ørsted example

7.6.6. BECCS dominates the sales of durable, engineered CDR credits

7.6.7. BECCS projects - trends and discussion

7.6.8. Ethanol production dominates the BECCS project pipeline

7.6.9. BECCS: Waste-to-energy

7.6.10. BECCS: Biogas upgrading

7.6.11. Network connecting bioethanol plants for BECCS

7.6.12. BECCS: Key takeaways

7.7. DOC (Direct Ocean Capture)

7.7.1. Direct ocean capture

7.7.2. Direct ocean capture status: Start-ups

7.7.3. Electrochemical direct ocean capture

7.7.4. Electrolysis for direct ocean capture: Avoiding chlorine formation

7.7.5. Other direct ocean capture technologies

7.7.6. Barriers remain for direct ocean capture

8. EMERGING CARBON DIOXIDE UTILIZATION

8.1. Introduction

8.1.1. Why CO2 utilization?

8.1.2. What is CO2 utilization?

8.1.3. Mature vs emerging carbon dioxide utilization market sizes

8.1.4. Why CO2 utilization should not be overlooked

8.1.5. How much does CO2U cost?

8.1.6. CO2 utilization pathways

8.1.7. Some CO2U applications have already proven profitable

8.1.8. Key Considerations for CO2U Market Growth

8.1.9. What is the Climate Impact of CO2 Utilization?

8.1.10. Current scale for CO2U products

8.1.11. Market potential for CO2U in 2045

8.1.12. Emerging CO2 utilization players

8.2. CO2-derived Concrete

8.2.1. CO2-Derived Concrete has High Growth Potential

8.2.2. The Basic Chemistry: CO2 Mineralization

8.2.3. CO2 use in the cement and concrete supply chain

8.2.4. CO2-Derived concrete application areas

8.2.5. CO2 derived concrete: Carbon credits

8.2.6. Ex-situ mineralization reactor types

8.2.7. Key trends in CO2-derived concrete

8.3. CO2-derived Chemicals and Fuels

8.3.1. CO2 conversion pathways to methanol, methane, gasoline, kerosene, and diesel

8.3.2. Decarbonization regulation mean sustainable fuels no longer need to achieve price-parity with fossil fuels

8.3.3. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) - role of CO2-derived fuels

8.3.4. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Syngas to hydrocarbons

8.3.5. FT reactor design comparison

8.3.6. FT reactor innovation - microchannel reactors

8.3.7. Fischer-Tropsch (FT) technology suppliers by plant scale

8.3.8. CO2 to CO pathways (syngas production) and players

8.3.9. Key players in reverse water gas shift (RWGS) for e-fuels

8.3.10. Start-ups in reverse water gas shift (RWGS) for e-fuels

8.3.11. RWGS-FT e-fuel plant case study

8.3.12. Direct Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: CO2 to hydrocarbons

8.3.13. CO2 derived e-fuels: Fischer-Tropsch vs Methanol-to-gasoline

8.3.14. MTG e-fuel plant case study

8.3.15. Syngas production: Dry methane reforming

8.3.16. CO2-derived methanol

8.3.17. Methanation overview

8.3.18. Biocatalytic methanation case study

8.3.19. Biological conversion

8.3.20. Electrochemical conversion

8.3.21. Key milestones for CO2-derived fuels in 2024/2025

8.3.22. Partial CO2 utilization - CO2-derived polymers and polyols

8.3.23. Catalysts for CO2-derived polymers

9. CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE

9.1. Introduction

9.1.1. The case for carbon dioxide storage or sequestration

9.1.2. Storing supercritical CO2 underground

9.1.3. Mechanisms of subsurface CO₂ trapping

9.1.4. CO2 leakage is a small risk

9.1.5. Earthquakes and CO2 leakage

9.1.6. Storage type for geologic CO2 storage: Saline aquifers

9.1.7. Storage type for geologic CO2 storage: Depleted oil and gas fields

9.1.8. Unconventional storage resources: Coal seams and shale

9.1.9. Unconventional storage resources: Basalts and ultra-mafic rocks

9.1.10. Estimates of global CO₂ storage space

9.1.11. CO2 storage potential by country

9.1.12. Permitting and authorization of CO2 storage

9.1.13. CO2 storage in the US: Class VI injection permits

9.1.14. Class VI injection well permits in the US: Costs and timeline

9.1.15. CO2 storage in the EU: Net-Zero Industry Act

9.1.16. Monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) in CO₂ storage

9.1.17. MRV Technologies and Costs in CO2 Storage

9.2. Status of CO2 Storage Projects

9.2.1. Technology status of CO₂ storage

9.2.2. World map of operational and under construction large-scale dedicated CO2 storage sites

9.2.3. Available CO2 storage will soon outstrip CO2 captured

9.2.4. Dedicated geological storage will soon outpace CO2-EOR

9.2.5. Can CO₂ storage be monetized?

9.2.6. Part-chain storage project in the North Sea: The Longship Project

9.2.7. Part-chain storage project in the North Sea: The Porthos Project

9.2.8. The cost of carbon sequestration (1/2)

9.2.9. The cost of carbon sequestration (2/2)

9.2.10. Carbon dioxide storage-type maturity and operator landscape

9.2.11. CO2 storage: Key takeaways

9.2.12. CO2 storage and geothermal energy

9.3. CO2-EOR

9.3.1. What is CO2-EOR?

9.3.2. What happens to the injected CO2?

9.3.3. Types of CO2-EOR designs

9.3.4. CO2-Enhanced oil recovery market

9.3.5. CO2-EOR in the US

9.3.6. Most CO2 in the U.S. is still naturally sourced

9.3.7. CO2-EOR main players in the U.S.

9.3.8. World's large-scale CO2 capture with CO2-EOR facilities

9.3.9. Worldwide CO2-EOR Potential

9.3.10. CO2-EOR in China

9.3.11. The economics of promoting CO2 storage through CO2-EOR

9.3.12. The impact of oil prices on CO2-EOR feasibility

9.3.13. Climate considerations in CO2-EOR

9.3.14. CO2-EOR: Progressive or "Greenwashing"

9.3.15. Future advancements in CO2-EOR

9.3.16. Economics of CO2-EOR vs CO2 storage

9.3.17. Key takeaways: Market

9.3.18. Key takeaways: Environmental

9.3.19. Enhanced gas recovery

10. CARBON DIOXIDE TRANSPORTATION

10.1. Introduction to CO2 transportation

10.2. Phases of CO2 for transportation

10.3. Overview of CO2 transportation methods and conditions

10.4. Status of CO2 transportation methods in CCS projects

10.5. CO2 transportation by pipeline

10.6. CO2 pipeline infrastructure development in the US

10.7. CO2 pipelines: Technical challenges

10.8. CO2 transportation by ship

10.9. CO2 transportation by ship: Innovations in ship design

10.10. CO2 transportation by rail and truck

10.11. Purity requirements of CO2 transportation

10.12. General cost comparison of CO2 transportation methods

10.13. CAPEX and OPEX contributions

10.14. Cost considerations in CO₂ transport

10.15. Transboundary networks for CO2 transport: Europe

10.16. CO2 pipeline development in Europe

10.17. First cross-border CO2 T&S project: Northern Lights Longship project

10.18. Available CO2 transportation will soon outstrip CO2 captured

10.19. CO2 transport operators

10.20. CO2 transport and/or storage as a service business model

10.21. CO2 transportation: Key takeaways

11. CCUS MARKET FORECASTS

11.1. CCUS forecast methodology

11.2. CCUS forecast breakdown

11.3. CCUS market forecast - Overall discussion

11.4. CCUS capture capacity forecast by CO2 end point, Mtpa of CO2

11.5. CCUS forecast by CO₂ end point - Storage and enhanced oil recovery

11.6. CCUS forecast by CO₂ end point - Emerging utilization

11.7. CCUS capacity forecast by capture type, Mtpa of CO₂

11.8. CCUS forecast by capture type - Direct Air Capture (DAC) capacity forecast

11.9. Point-source capture capacity forecast by CO2 source sector, Mtpa of CO2

11.10. Point-source carbon capture forecast by CO2 source

11.11. Point-source carbon capture forecast by CO2 source - power generation

11.12. Point-source carbon capture forecast by CO2 source - cement and steel

11.13. CCUS capture capacity by region, Mtpa of CO2

11.14. CCUS capture capacity by region - North America

11.15. CCUS capture capacity by region - Europe and UK

11.16. CCUS capture capacity by region - Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Rest of World

11.17. Changes since the Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Markets 2025-2045 IDTechEx forecasts

12. COMPANY PROFILES

12.1. 8 Rivers

12.2. Airhive

12.3. Airrane: CCUS

12.4. Ardent

12.5. Atoco

12.6. Axens: DMX

12.7. Baker Hughes: Carbon Capture

12.8. Brentwood Industries: Structured Packing

12.9. Brineworks

12.10. Capso

12.11. Capsol Technologies

12.12. Captura

12.13. Carbon Blade

12.14. Carbon Neutral Fuels

12.15. Carbonbit Technologies

12.16. CarbonBridge

12.17. Chart Industries: CCUS

12.18. Clairity Tech

12.19. Climeworks

12.20. CO2 Lock

12.21. Concrete4Change

12.22. CyanoCapture

12.23. DACMA

12.24. eChemicles

12.25. Ecospray

12.26. Equatic

12.27. ESTECH

12.28. ExxonMobil: Methanol-to-Gasoline (MTG)

12.29. Fluor: Carbon Capture

12.30. FuelCell Energy

12.31. Heirloom

12.32. Holocene

12.33. Honeywell UOP: CO₂ Solutions

12.34. HYCO1

12.35. INERATEC

12.36. Infinium

12.37. ION Clean Energy

12.38. JCCL (Japan Carbon Cycle Labs)

12.39. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha ("K" Line): CCUS

12.40. Mantel

12.41. Mission Zero Technologies

12.42. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries: KM CDR Process

12.43. MTR (Membrane Technology and Research)

12.44. Nippon Chemical Industrial: R&D areas

12.45. Nuada: MOF-Based Carbon Capture

12.46. OXCCU

12.47. Paebbl

12.48. Parallel Carbon

12.49. Phlair

12.50. Q Power

12.51. Saipem: Bluenzyme

12.52. Shell & Technip Energies Alliance: CANSOLV Carbon Capture Technology

12.53. Skytree

12.54. SLB Capturi

12.55. Sumitomo SHI FW: Carbon Capture

12.56. Svante

12.57. Syklea

12.58. UniSieve

12.59. Velocys

12.60. Yama

ページTOPに戻る

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

webからのご注文・お問合せはこちらのフォームから承ります

本レポートと同分野（エネルギー貯蔵）の最新刊レポート

IDTechEx社のエネルギー、電池 - Energy, Batteries分野での最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORD（）の最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。

よくあるご質問

IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?

IDTechExはセンサ技術や3D印刷、電気自動車などの先端技術・材料市場を対象に広範かつ詳細な調査を行っています。データリソースはIDTechExの調査レポートおよび委託調査（個別調査）を取り扱う日... もっと見る

調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?

在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-４日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。

注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?

1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。

お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?

納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書（必要に応じて納品書も）を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ（通常は円払い）の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。

データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?

当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。

炭素回収・利用・貯留（CCUS）市場2026-2036：技術、市場予測、参入企業

サマリー

ビジネスモデル

点源捕捉技術の開発

地域別CCUS市場予測

本レポートで扱う主な質問

主要な側面

目次

1.要旨

2.序論

3.CCUSのビジネスモデル

4.CCS産業の現状

5. 炭素回収技術

6.主要産業のための炭素回収

7.二酸化炭素除去のための炭素回収（CDR）

8.新たな二酸化炭素利用

9.二酸化炭素貯蔵

10.二酸化炭素輸送

11.CCUS市場予測

Summary

Business model

Point-source capture technology developments

Regional CCUS market forecasts

Key questions answered in this report

Key Aspects

Table of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2. INTRODUCTION

3. BUSINESS MODELS FOR CCUS

4. STATUS OF THE CCUS INDUSTRY

5. CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES

6. CARBON CAPTURE FOR KEY INDUSTRIES

7. CARBON CAPTURE FOR CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL (CDR)

8. EMERGING CARBON DIOXIDE UTILIZATION

9. CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE

10. CARBON DIOXIDE TRANSPORTATION

11. CCUS MARKET FORECASTS

12. COMPANY PROFILES

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

本レポートと同分野（エネルギー貯蔵）の最新刊レポート

IDTechEx社の エネルギー、電池 - Energy, Batteries分野 での最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORD（）の最新刊レポート

よくあるご質問

IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?

調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?

注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?

お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?

データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?

IDTechEx社のエネルギー、電池 - Energy, Batteries分野での最新刊レポート