持続可能な化学品のための次世代原料2025-2035年：市場、プレーヤー、予測

Next-Generation Feedstocks for Sustainable Chemicals 2025-2035: Markets, Players, Forecasts

持続可能な化学物質のためのリグノセルロース系原料、都市廃棄物、藻類、プラスチック廃棄物、化学原料としての農業廃棄物、二酸化炭素利用、次世代技術、2Gセルロース系エタノール、リグニン用途 ... もっと見る

出版社	出版年月	電子版価格	納期	ページ数	言語
IDTechEx アイディーテックエックス	2025年4月30日	US$7,000 電子ファイル（1-5ユーザライセンス）ライセンス・価格情報注文方法はこちら	お問合わせください	316	英語

サマリー

持続可能な化学物質のためのリグノセルロース系原料、都市廃棄物、藻類、プラスチック廃棄物、化学原料としての農業廃棄物、二酸化炭素利用、次世代技術、2Gセルロース系エタノール、リグニン用途

次世代原料：持続可能な化学製品の未来を牽引する

化学業界は転換期にある。二酸化炭素排出量の削減と化石資源からの脱却への圧力が高まる中、次世代化学原料が潜在的な解決策として浮上している。IDTechExの最新レポート「持続可能な化学品のための次世代原料2025-2035年」：市場、プレーヤー、予測』では、この成長分野を形成する主要なイノベーション、課題、機会を詳細に分析している。

廃棄物が持続可能な化学物質の未来になるには？

食用作物と競合することが多い第一世代のバイオベース化学品とは異なり、次世代原料は、リグノセルロース系バイオマス（木材や農業廃棄物など）、非リグノセルロース系バイオマス（藻類や農業残渣など）、都市廃棄物、さらには回収された二酸化炭素など、再生可能な非食糧資源を活用します。これらの再生可能な炭素源は、従来の石油化学製品に代わる持続可能な代替品を提供するため、川下の化学製品のスコープ3排出量を大幅に削減することができる。これらの原料の多くは他産業の副産物であり、廃棄物を貴重なグリーンケミカル中間体、ポリマー、特殊化学品に変える循環型バイオエコノミーを支えている。

持続可能な化学生産の成長速度は？

次世代原料からの持続可能な化学生産は、多くの予想よりも成長が鈍化しているものの、多数の新規施設が計画されており、生産能力は拡大し続けると予想される。規制上のインセンティブと持続可能性へのコミットメントに後押しされ、次世代原料による化学生産能力は2025年から2035年にかけて年平均成長率16%で堅調に伸び、2035年には1,100万トンを超えると予測されている。業界の大手企業は、すでに持続可能な原料技術に投資している。例えばダウ・ケミカルは、ロッテルダムで計画されているXycle社の施設のようなプロジェクトを支援しており、年間21キロトンのプラスチック廃棄物を貴重な化学製品に加工する予定である。ダウによるザイクル社への投資は、プラスチック廃棄物やその他の代替原料を、年間300万トンの循環型・再生可能なソリューションに変換する技術の幅広いポートフォリオの一部である。もう一つの例はBASFで、使用済みプラスチック由来のベンゼンをケミカルリサイクルによって供給するため、2024年にEncinaと長期的パートナーシップを確立した。IDTechExの本レポートは、世界中の様々な投資やプロジェクトを調査し、化学生産と循環型バイオエコノミーに向けた前進の未来を形作る主要な傾向に焦点を当てている。

最大の課題は何か？

その利点にもかかわらず、経済性は依然として課題である。次世代原料から化学物質を抽出するコストは、従来の化石ベースの生産よりも高いことが多く、市場導入は原油価格に強く影響される。しかし、処理技術の進歩がこのギャップを埋めつつある。超音波キャビテーションを利用したリグニン抽出や、新興企業SonichemとLixeaによるイオン液体プロセスなどの革新的技術により、無臭のリグニン生産がよりスケーラブルになりつつあり、リグニンを燃やしてエネルギーにするよりもはるかに価値の高い応用が可能になっている。同様に、AnelotechやBioBTXのような企業の技術による都市廃棄物からのBTX（ベンゼン、トルエン、キシレン）生産におけるブレークスルーは、持続可能な芳香族への道を開いている。IDTechExのレポートでは、これらの技術的進歩とその商業的実現可能性について詳しく見ている。

持続可能な原料の影響は？

次世代原料は、特殊化学品、化学中間体、ポリマー、プラスチック、食品添加物、化粧品、医薬品の生産を通じて、化学産業に革命を起こす準備が整っている。これらの化学物質は、生分解性包装材や繊維製品から高性能コーティング剤やバイオベース樹脂に至るまで、何千もの日常製品の骨格を形成している。ブランドや消費者が持続可能な代替品をますます求めるようになるにつれ、これらの原料は、化学物質生産を再構築する上で極めて重要な役割を果たすことになる。

これまでの規制の枠組みは主にバイオ燃料に焦点を当ててきたが、炭素税やより広範な持続可能性に関する法律などの政策により、次世代化学原料への移行がさらに加速すると予想される。IDTechExのレポートでは、化石由来や第一世代の化学物質とのコスト比較、最新の技術革新など、次世代原料市場の包括的な分析を行っている。

持続可能な化学品の将来を理解したい方には、「持続可能な化学品のための次世代原料 2025-2035年」がおすすめです：市場、プレーヤー、予測』は不可欠な資料です。本レポートは、今後の課題と機会に関する貴重な洞察を提供し、業界のリーダーたちに、この重要な分野における技術革新と商業的採用を推進するために必要な知識を提供する。

次世代原料が化学産業の脱炭素化を再構築しようとしている今こそ、行動を起こすべき時です。本レポートで、より持続可能な化学の未来に向けた一歩先を進んでください。

本レポートでお答えする主な質問

持続可能な化学物質に関する主な政策と法規制は？
導入可能な既存の次世代原料は何か？
どのような破壊的技術が視野に入っているか？
持続可能で信頼性が高く、スケーラブルな次世代原料は何か？
次世代原料は、第1世代原料や化石由来原料と比べてどうなのか？
次世代原料の主な成長機会はどこにあるのか？
化学生産の持続可能性を向上させるために主要企業は何をしているのか？

主要な側面

IDTechExの本レポートは以下の主要な内容をカバーしている：

循環型バイオエコノミーにおける持続可能な化学生産のための次世代原料に関する考察。
次世代原料の概要、その調達、抽出可能な化学物質、強み、弱み、機会と脅威、商業活動
無臭リグニン抽出と価値化を含む、次世代原料からの化学物質生産に影響を与える技術開発の洞察
次世代原料からのさらなる化学物質ユースケースを可能にする新たな抽出技術のTRLと分析
第一世代原料や化石由来原料の両方と比較した次世代原料の経済的実行可能性に影響を与える要因
化学物質生産のための次世代原料が直面する市場の障壁と課題。
次世代原料と第1世代原料および化石由来原料との化学物質生産における比較。
化学品用次世代原料の市場分析（推進要因、主要プレーヤーの状況、稼働中の設備生産能力、計画中の設備生産能力、立ち上げ資金を含む）。
成否の要因分析を含む、次世代原料利用における現在および過去のプロジェクトについての考察。
化学品製造のための次世代原料を使用する70社以上の新興企業および既存企業の特定。
木くず、農業廃棄物、都市ごみ、二酸化炭素など、原料の種類別に区分した化学品生産能力の10年間の詳細な市場予測。

ページTOPに戻る

Summary

Lignocellulosic feedstocks for sustainable chemicals, municipal waste, algae, plastic waste, agricultural waste as chemical feedstocks, carbon dioxide utilization, next-generation technologies, 2G cellulosic ethanol, and lignin applications

Next-Generation Feedstocks: Driving the Future of Sustainable Chemicals

The chemical industry is at a turning point. With increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions and move away from fossil-based resources, next-generation chemical feedstocks are emerging as a potential solution. IDTechEx's latest report, Next-Generation Feedstocks for Sustainable Chemicals 2025-2035: Markets, Players, Forecasts, provides an in-depth analysis of the key innovations, challenges, and opportunities shaping this growing sector.

How can waste become the future of sustainable chemicals?

Unlike first-generation bio-based chemicals that often compete with food crops, next-generation feedstocks leverage renewable, non-food sources such as lignocellulosic biomass (for example, wood and agricultural waste), non-lignocellulosic biomass (for example, algae and agricultural residues), municipal waste, and even captured carbon dioxide. These renewable sources of carbon provide a sustainable alternative to conventional petrochemicals and therefore significantly reduce scope 3 emissions for downstream chemical products. Many of these feedstocks are by-products of other industries, supporting a circular bioeconomy that turns waste into valuable green chemical intermediates, polymers, and specialty chemicals.

How fast is sustainable chemical production growing?

While growth in sustainable chemical production from next-generation feedstocks has been slower than many anticipated, production capacity is expected to continue expanding with numerous new facilities in the pipeline. Driven by regulatory incentives and sustainability commitments, chemical production capacity from next-generation feedstocks is forecast to grow at a robust 16% CAGR from 2025-2035, reaching over 11 million tonnes by 2035. Major industry players are already investing in sustainable feedstock technologies. Dow Chemical, for instance, is supporting projects such as Xycle's planned facility in Rotterdam, which will process 21 kilotonnes of plastic waste annually into valuable chemical products. Dow's investment in Xycle is part of a broad portfolio of technologies to transform plastic waste and other forms of alternative feedstocks into 3 million tonnes of circular and renewable solutions annually. Another example is BASF, which established a long-term partnership with Encina in 2024 for the supply of benzene derived from end-of-life plastics via chemical recycling. This IDTechEx report explores various investments and projects around the world, highlighting key trends that will shape the future of chemical production and advancement towards a circular bioeconomy.

What are the biggest challenges?

Despite its advantages, economic viability remains a challenge. The cost of extracting chemicals from next-generation feedstocks is often higher than conventional fossil-based production, and market adoption is strongly influenced by crude oil prices. However, advancements in processing technologies are helping to close this gap. Innovations such as ultrasonic cavitation-based lignin extraction and the ionic liquids process from startups Sonichem and Lixea are making odor-free lignin production more scalable, with much higher value applications than burning lignin for energy. Similarly, breakthroughs in BTX (benzene, toluene, xylene) production from municipal waste through technologies from companies like Anellotech and BioBTX are paving the way for sustainable aromatics. IDTechEx's report provides an in-depth look at these technical advancements and their commercial viability.

What will be the impact of sustainable feedstocks?

Next-generation feedstocks are poised to revolutionize the chemical industry, through the production of specialty chemicals, chemical intermediates, polymers, plastics, food additives, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. These chemicals form the backbone of thousands of everyday products, from biodegradable packaging and textiles to high-performance coatings and bio-based resins. As brands and consumers increasingly demand sustainable alternatives, these feedstocks will play a crucial role in reshaping chemical production.

Regulatory frameworks so far have largely focused on biofuels, but policies such as carbon taxes and broader sustainability legislation are expected to further accelerate the transition to next-generation chemical feedstocks. The IDTechEx report provides a comprehensive analysis of the market for next-generation feedstocks, including cost comparisons with fossil-based and 1st generation chemicals, and the latest technological innovations.

For those looking to understand the future of sustainable chemicals, Next-Generation Feedstocks for Sustainable Chemicals 2025-2035: Markets, Players, Forecasts is an essential resource. The report offers invaluable insights into the challenges and opportunities ahead, equipping industry leaders with the knowledge needed to drive innovation and commercial adoption in this critical space.

With next-generation feedstocks poised to reshape decarbonization of the chemical industry, now is the time to act. Explore the report today and stay ahead of the curve on the journey toward a more sustainable chemical future.

Key questions answered in this report

What are the key policies and legislations for sustainable chemicals?
What are the existing next-generation feedstocks that can be implemented?
What disruptive technologies are on the horizon?
Which next-generation feedstocks are sustainable, reliable, and scalable?
How do next-generation feedstocks compare to 1st generation and fossil-based feedstocks?
Where are the key growth opportunities for next-generation feedstocks?
What are key players doing to improve the sustainability of chemical production?

Key Aspects

This report from IDTechEx covers the following key contents:

Discussion of next generation feedstocks for sustainable chemical production within a circular bioeconomy.
Overview of next generation feedstocks, their sourcing, the chemicals possible to extract, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, commercial activity
Insight into technology developments influencing chemical production from next generation feedstocks, including odor-free lignin extraction and valorization
TRL and analysis of emerging extraction technologies enabling further chemical use cases from next generation feedstocks
Factors affecting the economic viability of next generation feedstocks compared to both 1st generation feedstocks and fossil-based feedstocks.
Market barriers and challenges faced by next generation feedstocks for chemical production.
Comparison of next generation feedstocks to 1st generation and fossil-based feedstocks for chemicals.
Market analysis of next generation feedstocks for chemicals, including drivers, key player landscape, operational facility production capacities, planned facility capacities, and startup funding.
Discussion of current and prior projects in next generation feedstock utilization, including an analysis of factors for success or failure.
Identification of 70+ emerging startups and established players operating with next generation feedstocks for chemical production.
Detailed 10-year market forecasts of chemical production capacity segmented by feedstock type, including wood waste, agricultural waste, municipal waste, and carbon dioxide.

ページTOPに戻る

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1. The need to decarbonize the chemical industry

1.2. Alternative feedstock classifications

1.3. Chemicals sourced from next-generation feedstocks

1.4. Next-generation feedstocks market drivers: demand for sustainable products

1.5. Next-generation feedstocks market drivers: government regulation

1.6. Next-generation feedstocks market drivers: carbon taxes may increase adoption of next-generation feedstocks

1.7. Factors affecting the economic viability of next-generation feedstock projects

1.8. Impact of oil prices on next-generation feedstock adoption

1.9. Next-generation feedstock barriers: process costs

1.10. Next-generation feedstocks barriers: capital costs

1.11. Economic difficulties have resulted in project delays and cancellations

1.12. Major market challenges for next-generation feedstocks

1.13. Next-generation feedstocks: SWOT analysis

1.14. Next-generation feedstocks: overview of types

1.15. Lignocellulosic feedstocks for chemicals: lignin valorization

1.16. Lignocellulosic feedstocks for chemicals: key players

1.17. Lignocellulosic feedstocks for chemicals: key takeaways

1.18. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks for chemicals: key players

1.19. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks for chemicals: key takeaways

1.20. Municipal waste for chemicals: key players

1.21. Municipal waste for chemicals: key takeaways

1.22. Greenhouse gases for chemicals: key players

1.23. Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of emerging conversion processes for biochemicals

1.24. Greenhouse gas feedstocks: IDTechEx TRL assessment for large-scale CO₂ utilization

1.25. Technology Readiness Level (TRL): Carbon dioxide utilization products

1.26. Greenhouse gas feedstocks for chemicals: key takeaways

1.27. Next-generation feedstocks for chemical production 2025-2035 forecast

1.28. Next-generation feedstocks forecast discussion (I)

1.29. Next-generation feedstocks forecast discussion (II)

1.30. Key takeaways from this report (I)

1.31. Key takeaways from this report (II)

1.32. Company profiles

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1. Over two-thirds of emissions from the chemical industry are embedded

2.2. The chemical industry's decarbonization challenge

2.3. The new carbon cycle

2.4. Alternative feedstock classifications

2.5. Next-generation feedstocks in the circular bioeconomy

2.6. 1st generation feedstocks

2.7. 1st generation feedstocks: issues

2.8. Next-generation feedstocks: benefits and challenges

2.9. Chemicals sourced from next-generation feedstocks

2.10. Report scope

2.11. IDTechEx circular economy research

2.12. Report structure

3. NEXT-GENERATION FEEDSTOCKS MARKET ANALYSIS

3.1. Market analysis introduction

3.1.1. Market analysis: introduction

3.2. Next-generation feedstock: market drivers and analysis

3.2.1. Market drivers: demand for sustainable products

3.2.2. Market drivers: current chemical industry emissions

3.2.3. Market drivers: government regulation

3.2.4. Market drivers: the proposed Critical Chemicals Act for Europe

3.2.5. Current legislation focuses on biofuels

3.2.6. Market drivers: European funding support of next-generation feedstocks

3.2.7. Market drivers: carbon taxes may increase adoption of next-generation feedstocks

3.2.8. Market drivers: geopolitical pressure could result in onshoring feedstocks

3.2.9. Market drivers: Public and internal pressure for sustainable feedstocks

3.2.10. Market driver: major chemical company sustainability promises

3.2.11. Market drivers: NGOs for a circular bioeconomy

3.2.12. Market analysis: next-generation feedstocks compared to 1st generation

3.2.13. Market analysis: less land use change for next-generation feedstocks

3.2.14. Land use as an advantage for next-generation feedstocks is debated by some

3.2.15. Market analysis: chemical demand and next-generation feedstock underutilization

3.2.16. Market analysis: biobased BTX molecules could become important precursor chemicals to sustainable products

3.2.17. Market analysis: biobased next-generation ethanol could become an important precursor chemical

3.2.18. Next-generation bioethanol: drivers

3.2.19. Next-generation bioethanol: barriers

3.3. Economic viability of next-generation feedstocks

3.3.1. Factors affecting the economic viability of next-generation feedstock projects

3.3.2. Impact of oil prices on next-generation feedstock adoption

3.3.3. Effects of Brent crude prices on next-generation chemical products

3.3.4. The Green Premium for next-generation chemicals

3.3.5. Next-generation feedstocks and crude oil cost comparison (I)

3.3.6. Next-generation feedstocks and crude oil cost comparison (II)

3.3.7. Process costs are a barrier to the economic viability of next-generation feedstocks

3.3.8. Chemicals with potential to become biobased based on price

3.3.9. Shift from commodity products to lower volume, high value markets could give economic viability

3.3.10. Next-generation feedstocks barriers: capital costs

3.3.11. Reduction in next-generation feedstock costs expected with scale-up

3.3.12. Economic difficulties have resulted in project delays and cancellations

3.3.13. Major market challenges for next-generation feedstocks

3.3.14. Next-generation feedstocks: key SWOT analysis

3.4. Player and start-up Landscape

3.4.1. Player landscape: operational and planned facilities introduction

3.4.2. Player landscape: operational plants

3.4.3. Player landscape: planned plants

3.4.4. Major chemical company investments in next-generation feedstocks

3.4.5. Company landscape: Start-up players funding

4. PROCESSES

4.1. Chapter scope

4.2. Anaerobic digestion

4.3. Fermentation

4.4. Pyrolysis

4.5. Gasification

4.6. Summary of pretreatment processes

5. LIGNOCELLULOSIC FEEDSTOCKS

5.1. Lignocellulosic feedstocks introduction

5.1.1. Lignocellulosic biomass introduction

5.1.2. Utilization of cellulose

5.1.3. Utilization of hemicellulose

5.1.4. Cellulose and hemicellulose for precursor chemicals

5.1.5. Lignin utilization

5.1.6. Potential products from lignin

5.1.7. Challenges for lignocellulosic biomass

5.1.8. Lignocellulosic biomass suppliers: Forest Concepts

5.2. Wood-based feedstocks

5.2.1. Traditional lignocellulosic biomass

5.2.2. Wood waste feedstocks

5.2.3. Wood waste: Chemical products

5.2.4. Wood waste: odor free lignin players

5.2.5. Wood waste: odor-free lignin extraction processes at pilot scale

5.2.6. Wood waste: other players

5.2.7. Black Liquor as a Feedstock

5.2.8. Black Liquor Players and Products

5.2.9. Lignosulfonates as a Feedstock

5.2.10. Lignosulfonates Products and Players

5.3. Agricultural waste

5.3.1. Agricultural waste as a lignocellulosic feedstock

5.3.2. The agriculture industry in 2025

5.3.3. Wheat waste feedstocks: straw, husk and bran

5.3.4. Wheat straw: OptisoChem

5.3.5. Wheat straw: processing technologies

5.3.6. Wheat straw: Re:Chemistry

5.3.7. Rice waste feedstock: straw and husk

5.3.8. Rice waste feedstock: players

5.3.9. Corn Stover feedstock

5.3.10. Corn stover: New Energy Blue

5.3.11. Corn stover: other players

5.3.12. Sugarcane bagasse

5.3.13. Sugarcane bagasse: players

5.3.14. Cereal straw feedstocks: an overview

5.3.15. Cereal straw: current uses and competition

5.3.16. Coffee waste feedstocks

5.3.17. Coffee grounds: commercial activity

5.3.18. Other potential agricultural waste feedstocks

5.4. Energy crops

5.4.1. Lignocellulosic energy crops

5.4.2. Energy crops feedstocks

5.4.3. Energy crops: players

5.4.4. Bamboo as a feedstock

5.5. Lignocellulosic feedstocks: key takeaways

5.5.1. Key players for chemical production from lignocellulosic feedstock

5.5.2. Lignocellulosic feedstock costs

5.5.3. Chemical production capacities from lignocellulosic feedstock

5.5.4. Lignin valorization

5.5.5. Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of lignin extraction processes for biochemicals

5.5.6. Lignocellulosic feedstocks: key SWOT analysis

5.5.7. Lignocellulosic feedstocks: key takeaways

6. NON-LIGNOCELLULOSIC FEEDSTOCKS

6.1. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks introduction

6.1.1. Non-lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks

6.1.2. Chemical products from non-lignocellulosic feedstocks

6.1.3. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks: benefits and challenges

6.2. Agricultural waste

6.2.1. Citrus waste: sources and composition

6.2.2. Citrus waste: uses and chemical products

6.2.3. Citrus waste: Commercial activity

6.2.4. Apple pomace feedstocks

6.2.5. Grape pomace feedstocks

6.2.6. Grape waste: commercial activity

6.2.7. Oil cake: olive waste and other feedstocks

6.2.8. Oil cake: commercial activity for olive waste

6.2.9. Ruminant manure feedstocks

6.2.10. Manure: commercial activity

6.2.11. Whey and dairy waste feedstocks

6.2.12. Whey: players

6.2.13. Tomato residues

6.2.14. Tomato residues: players and research

6.2.15. Potato peel waste: feedstock description and players

6.2.16. Food and beverage waste feedstocks

6.2.17. Food and beverage waste: players

6.2.18. Food and beverage waste: projects

6.2.19. Citric Acid from sugarcane processing waste

6.2.20. Agricultural waste: other players (I)

6.2.21. Agricultural waste: other players (II)

6.2.22. Agricultural waste: Pyran

6.3. Algae based feedstocks

6.3.1. Introduction: algae as a chemical feedstock

6.3.2. Macroalgae, microalgae and cyanobacteria

6.3.3. Key drivers and challenges for marine based feedstocks

6.3.4. Algae: introduction, pros and cons

6.3.5. Cyanobacteria: advantages, disadvantages and products

6.3.6. Algae has multiple market applications

6.3.7. CO₂ capture & utilization - key application for microalgae & cyanobacteria

6.3.8. Production process using microalgae / cyanobacteria

6.3.9. Production process using macroalgae (seaweed)

6.3.10. Key growth criteria in microalgae cultivation

6.3.11. Open vessels for microalgae cultivation

6.3.12. Closed vessels for microalgae cultivation

6.3.13. Open vs closed algae cultivation systems

6.3.14. Microalgae cultivation system suppliers: photobioreactors (PBRs) & ponds

6.3.15. Case study - CO₂ capture from cement plants using algae

6.3.16. Algal biofuel development has faced historical challenges which could result in shift in focus towards chemicals

6.3.17. Algal biofuel companies shifted focus or went bust

6.3.18. Algae feedstocks: players (I)

6.3.19. Algae feedstocks: players (II)

6.3.20. Cyanobacteria feedstocks: players (I)

6.3.21. Cyanobacteria feedstocks: Players (II)

6.3.22. Seaweed feedstocks: players

6.3.23. SWOT analysis for marine-based chemical feedstocks

6.4. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks: key takeaways

6.4.1. Key players for chemical production from non-lignocellulosic feedstock

6.4.2. Chemical production capacities from non-lignocellulosic feedstock

6.4.3. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks: key SWOT analysis

6.4.4. Non-lignocellulosic feedstocks: key takeaways

7. MUNICIPAL WASTE FEEDSTOCKS

7.1. Municipal waste introduction

7.1.1. Municipal Waste: Introduction

7.1.2. Report scope: municipal waste

7.2. Municipal waste feedstocks

7.2.1. Municipal Green Waste

7.2.2. Municipal waste feedstocks

7.2.3. BTX chemicals from plastic waste: players

7.2.4. BTX conversion technologies and commercial scale

7.2.5. Syngas, ethanol and methanol from municipal waste: players

7.2.6. Plastic waste: other players

7.2.7. Sewage and wastewater feedstocks

7.2.8. Wastewater feedstocks: players

7.3. Plastic depolymerization

7.3.1. Depolymerization: introduction

7.3.2. Overview of depolymerization approaches

7.3.3. Depolymerization by plastic type overview

7.3.4. Chemical pathways for PET depolymerization

7.3.5. Depolymerization of polystyrene

7.3.6. Depolymerization of polyolefins

7.3.7. Companies pursuing enzyme depolymerization

7.3.8. Microwave technology for chemical depolymerization

7.3.9. The role of ionic liquids in chemical depolymerization

7.4. Municipal waste feedstocks: key takeaways

7.4.1. Key players for chemical production from municipal waste

7.4.2. Depolymerization players by type

7.4.3. Chemical production capacities from municipal waste

7.4.4. Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of BTX production from municipal waste

7.4.5. Municipal waste feedstocks: key SWOT analysis

7.4.6. Municipal waste feedstocks: key takeaways

8. GREENHOUSE GAS FEEDSTOCKS

8.1. Greenhouse gas feedstocks introduction

8.1.1. Gaseous Feedstocks: Introduction

8.1.2. Greenhouse gases: chapter structure

8.1.3. CO₂ has many use cases

8.1.4. CO₂ can be converted into a range of chemicals

8.1.5. The basics: types of CO₂ utilization reactions

8.1.6. Using CO₂ as a feedstock is energy-intensive

8.1.7. The source of captured CO₂ matters

8.1.8. CO₂ may need to be first converted into CO or syngas

8.1.9. Methane and syngas as feedstocks for chemicals

8.2. CO₂ as a feedstock for methane

8.2.1. Different sources of methane

8.2.2. Methanation overview

8.2.3. Thermocatalytic pathway to e-methane

8.2.4. Thermocatalytic methanation case study

8.2.5. Biological fermentation of CO₂ into e-methane

8.2.6. Biocatalytic methanation case study

8.2.7. Thermocatalytic vs biocatalytic methanation

8.2.8. Methanation technology: key SWOT

8.2.9. Existing and future CO₂-derived methane projects

8.2.10. Methanation company landscape (I)

8.2.11. Methanation company landscape (II)

8.2.12. Methane as a chemical intermediate focuses on methanol production

8.3. CO₂ as a feedstock for methanol

8.3.1. Methanol is a valuable chemical feedstock

8.3.2. Cost parity has been a challenge for CO₂-derived methanol

8.3.3. Thermochemical methods: CO₂-derived methanol

8.3.4. Carbon Recycling International: Direct hydrogenation

8.3.5. Direct methanol synthesis from H₂O & CO₂

8.3.6. Major CO₂-derived methanol projects

8.4. CO₂ as a feedstock for other chemicals

8.4.1. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: syngas to hydrocarbons

8.4.2. Direct Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: CO₂ to hydrocarbons

8.4.3. CO₂ use in urea production

8.4.4. Aromatic hydrocarbons from CO₂

8.4.5. CO₂ microbial conversion to produce chemicals

8.4.6. CO₂-consuming microorganisms

8.4.7. CO₂ for ethanol and other chemicals: LanzaTech

8.4.8. CO₂ and methane for PHB production via biotechnology

8.4.9. Key players in chemosynthetic biological conversion for CO₂ utilization (I)

8.4.10. Key players in chemosynthetic biological conversion for CO₂ utilization (II)

8.4.11. Key players in chemosynthetic biological conversion for CO₂ utilization (III)

8.4.12. Scaling bioreactors - specific technical challenges

8.5. Greenhouse gas feedstocks: key takeaways

8.5.1. Greenhouse gas feedstocks: key players

8.5.2. IDTechEx TRL assessment for large-scale CO₂ utilization

8.5.3. Technology Readiness Level (TRL): CO₂U products

8.5.4. Greenhouse gas feedstocks: key takeaways

9. NEXT-GENERATION FEEDSTOCKS FOR CHEMICALS: MARKET FORECASTS

9.1. Forecasting data sources

9.2. Forecasting methodology (I)

9.3. Chemical production capacity from next-generation feedstocks forecast

9.4. CO₂ utilization for next-generation chemicals forecast

9.5. Chemical production capacity from next-generation feedstocks forecast

9.6. Next-generation feedstocks forecast discussion (I)

9.7. Next-generation feedstocks forecast discussion (II)

9.8. Next-generation feedstocks forecast takeaways

10. COMPANY PROFILES

10.1. Aduro Clean Technologies

10.2. Afyren

10.3. Anellotech

10.4. BioBTX

10.5. Biolive

10.6. CelluForce

10.7. Celtic Renewables

10.8. Chaincraft

10.9. Chempolis

10.10. Chiyoda: CCUS

10.11. Enginzyme

10.12. Industrial Microbes

10.13. LanzaTech

10.14. LanzaTech (2023 update)

10.15. Lenzing Group

10.16. Lixea

10.17. New Energy Blue

10.18. Ourobio

10.19. OxFA

10.20. PeelPioneers

10.21. Pyrowave

10.22. Re:Chemistry

10.23. Sonichem

10.24. Straw Innovations

ページTOPに戻る

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

webからのご注文・お問合せはこちらのフォームから承ります

本レポートと同分野（ケミカル）の最新刊レポート

IDTechEx社の先端材料 - Advanced Materials分野での最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORD（）の最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORDの最新刊レポートはありません。

よくあるご質問

IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?

IDTechExはセンサ技術や3D印刷、電気自動車などの先端技術・材料市場を対象に広範かつ詳細な調査を行っています。データリソースはIDTechExの調査レポートおよび委託調査（個別調査）を取り扱う日... もっと見る

調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?

在庫のあるものは速納となりますが、平均的には 3-４日と見て下さい。
但し、一部の調査レポートでは、発注を受けた段階で内容更新をして納品をする場合もあります。
発注をする前のお問合せをお願いします。

注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?

1)お客様からの御問い合わせをいただきます。
2)見積書やサンプルの提示をいたします。
3)お客様指定、もしくは弊社の発注書をメール添付にて発送してください。
4)データリソース社からレポート発行元の調査会社へ納品手配します。
5) 調査会社からお客様へ納品されます。最近は、pdfにてのメール納品が大半です。

お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?

納品と同時にデータリソース社よりお客様へ請求書（必要に応じて納品書も）を発送いたします。
お客様よりデータリソース社へ（通常は円払い）の御振り込みをお願いします。
請求書は、納品日の日付で発行しますので、翌月最終営業日までの当社指定口座への振込みをお願いします。振込み手数料は御社負担にてお願いします。
お客様の御支払い条件が60日以上の場合は御相談ください。
尚、初めてのお取引先や個人の場合、前払いをお願いすることもあります。ご了承のほど、お願いします。

データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?

当社は、世界各国の主要調査会社・レポート出版社と提携し、世界各国の市場調査レポートや技術動向レポートなどを日本国内の企業・公官庁及び教育研究機関に提供しております。
世界各国の「市場・技術・法規制などの」実情を調査・収集される時には、データリソース社にご相談ください。
お客様の御要望にあったデータや情報を抽出する為のレポート紹介や調査のアドバイスも致します。

持続可能な化学品のための次世代原料2025-2035年：市場、プレーヤー、予測

サマリー

次世代原料：持続可能な化学製品の未来を牽引する

廃棄物が持続可能な化学物質の未来になるには？

持続可能な化学生産の成長速度は？

最大の課題は何か？

持続可能な原料の影響は？

本レポートでお答えする主な質問

主要な側面

目次

Summary

Next-Generation Feedstocks: Driving the Future of Sustainable Chemicals

How can waste become the future of sustainable chemicals?

How fast is sustainable chemical production growing?

What are the biggest challenges?

What will be the impact of sustainable feedstocks?

Key questions answered in this report

Key Aspects

Table of Contents

ご注文は、お電話またはWEBから承ります。お見積もりの作成もお気軽にご相談ください。

本レポートと同分野（ケミカル）の最新刊レポート

IDTechEx社の先端材料 - Advanced Materials分野での最新刊レポート

本レポートと同じKEY WORD（）の最新刊レポート

よくあるご質問

IDTechEx社はどのような調査会社ですか?

調査レポートの納品までの日数はどの程度ですか?

注文の手続きはどのようになっていますか?

お支払方法の方法はどのようになっていますか?

データリソース社はどのような会社ですか?