価格・ご注文について 目次 この調査レポートは、キャリアのオーバーザトップ(OTT)ブロードバンドサービスのユーザ調査を行い、その特徴を分析しています。 This report identifies four non-overlapping OTT-dependent segments (Replacers, Supplementers, Optimals, and Non-OTT Consumers) and analyzes the characteristics that define and distinguish each segment, including demographics, psychographics, TV viewing and subscription habits, technology dispositions, interest in alternative TV services, and a host of other characteristics. The data reveals an emerging market comprised of very different consumer segments with different motivations and service expectations. Summary TDG’s quantum theory of media suggests that, as open broadband connections reach deeper into our lives and establish new points of contact, consumers will enjoy greater choice and exert more influence over media. This premise has fueled the “any content, anywhere, anytime, any device” mantra which characterizes the “digital home” and “connected consumer” market spaces.The emergence of alternative home video services such as Over-the-Top (OTT) are early examples of quantum media in action. With a broadband connection to the TV (either direct or via a home network), consumers will have access to the growing array of online video services today enjoyed on a PC monitor. An all-too-frequent mistake made by both OTT enthusiasts and detractors is casting the model strictly as a “Cord Cutting” phenomenon and thus directly competitive with basic PayTV services. Yes, OTT-as-replacement services are aimed squarely at the undermining the base PayTV service relationship. OTT-as-supplement services, however, can either be competitive or collaborative. They can be competitive in the sense that they can steal high-margin value-added service revenue from incumbents (e.g., Vudu offers a much better video-on-demand service than most cable operators) and collaborative in the sense that can expand an incumbents service offerings (e.g., Vudu provides an excellent way for smaller cable operators to add VOD to their service mix). This report identifies four non-overlapping OTT-dependent segments (Replacers, Supplementers, Optimals, and Non-OTT Consumers) and analyzes the characteristics that define and distinguish each segment, including demographics, psychographics, TV viewing and subscription habits, technology dispositions, interest in alternative TV services, and a host of other characteristics. The data reveals an emerging market comprised of very different consumer segments with different motivations and service expectations. | The Diffusion Groupより、無料レポート「Over-the-Top, Cord-Cutting and the Consumer」が 発行されています。詳細はこちらをご覧ください。 | TOP Table of Contents Key Findings 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Preliminary Comments 1.2 Methodology 2.0 Identifying OTT Intenders 2.1 Segmenting the market by OTT Status 3.0 OTT Segment Profile - Consumer Electronic Ownership 3.1 Home TVs 3.1.1 Types of TVs in Use 3.1.2 Proclivity to Purchase New HDTV Set 3.1.3 Proclivity to Spend More for Internet-Enabled HDTV Set 3.2 Home Theater Ownership 3.3 Current Generation Game Console Ownership 4.0 OTT Segment Profiles ? PayTV Services 4.1 Primary Home PayTV Service 4.2 Service Tenure 4.3 Number of Channels to Which Consumers Subscribe 4.4 Hours per Week Spent Viewing TV 4.5 Subscription to Value-Added PayTV Services 4.6 Monthly PayTV Expenses 4.7 Satisfaction with and Value Perception of Current PayTV Service 4.8 Likelihood of Service Churn 4.9 Likelihood of Service Downgrade 4.10 Satisfaction with Forced Program Tiers or Packages/Lack of A La Carte 5.0 OTT Segment Profiles ? Broadband and Home Network Usage 5.1 Broadband Service Subscriptions 5.2 Home Network Usage 5.3 Ancillary Video Platforms Connected to the Home Network 6.0 OTT Segment Profiles - Web Video Usage 6.1 Hours per Week Spent Using the Web 6.2 Online Video Viewing 6.2.1 Generally 6.2.2 Frequency of Viewing Online Video 7.0 OTT Segment Profile ? Video Content Preferences 7.1 Interest in Specific Web-to-TV Content Delivery 7.2 Price Sensitivity towards Web-to-TV Video Access 7.3 “Desert Island 10” ? Most Desirable Channels for a Broadband TV Service 8.0 OTT Profile - Demographics 8.1 Gender 8.2 Age 8.3 Ethnicity 8.4 Income 8.5 Education 8.6 Residential Status 8.7 Residential Setting 8.8 Number of Occupants per Household 8.9 Technological Dispositions 8.9.1 PC Skills 8.9.2 Tech Adopter Status List of Tables Table 1 - Number of Channels Included in Current PayTV Subscription Table 2 - Number of Channels Which Consumers Watch A Couple Times per Week Table 3 - Weekly TV Viewing Table 4 - Hours per Week Spent Using the Web Table 5 - Personal Hours per Week Spent Viewing Online Video Table 6 - OTT Status and Web-to-TV Content Preferences Table 7 - OTT Status and Top 1-13 Linear Channels Preferred for OTT Service Table 8 - OTT Status and Top 14-36 Linear Channels Preferred for OTT Service List of Figures Figure 1 - Sony’s Digital Video Service Rollout Strategy Figure 2 - The Connected Multi-Source Television - an In-Home Topology Figure 3 - Evolution of OTT Video Revenue Sources Figure 4 - Segmentation by OTT Status Figure 5 - Ownership of Various Types of TVs Figure 6 - Proclivity to Purchase New HDTV Set Figure 7 - Additional Amount HDTV Intenders Would Spend for TV-Based Internet Access Figure 8 - Home Theater Ownership Figure 9 - Current Generation Game Console Ownership Figure 10 - Primary PayTV Service in Use Figure 11 - PayTV Service Tenure Figure 12 - Light, Moderate, and Heavy TV Viewing Figure 13 - Subscription to Value-Added PayTV Services Figure 14 - Current Monthly PayTV Expenses Figure 15 -- Satisfaction with PayTV Service Figure 16 - Perceived Value of PayTV Service Figure 17 - Proclivity to Change PayTV Providers in Next Six Months Figure 18 - Primary Reason for Wanting to Switch PayTV Provider Figure 19 - Proclivity to Downgrade Level of Service in Next Six Months Figure 20 -- Primary Reason for Wanting to Downgrade PayTV Service Figure 21 - View of Current Prepackaged Content Tiers Figure 22 - Type of Residential Broadband Service in Use Figure 23 - Home Network Familiarity and Use among Broadband Households Figure 24 - Networked Video Platforms among OTT Segments Figure 25 - Online Video Viewing by Segment Figure 26 - Online TV Viewing by Segment Figure 27 - Price Sensitivity towards Web-to-TV Video Access Figure 28 - OTT Status and Gender Figure 29 - OTT Status and Age Figure 30 - OTT Status and Education Figure 31 - OTT Status and Income Figure 32 - OTT Status and Residential Status Figure 33 - OTT Status and Residential Setting Figure 34 - OTT Status and Number of Home Occupants Figure 35 - OTT Status and PCs Skills Figure 36 - OTT Status and Tech Adopter Status |